###
气象:2011,37(8):1026-1030
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
2011年3—5月T639、ECMWF及日本模式中期预报性能检验
(国家气象中心,北京 100081)
Performance Verification of the Medium Range Forecasting for T639,ECMWF and Japan Models from March to May 2011
(National Meteorological Centre, Beijing 100081)
摘要
图/表
参考文献
相似文献
本文已被:浏览 1326次   下载 1637
投稿时间:2011-06-27    修订日期:2011-07-06
中文摘要: 为了更好地应用T639模式中期预报产品,对2011年3—5月T639 模式96小时预报产品进行了天气学检验,并与ECMWF、日本模式进行了对比分析。结果表明:三种模式均对亚洲中高纬环流形势的调整和演变具有较好的预报性能。综合来看,ECMWF模式对各系统及要素的预报最接近实况;日本模式和T639模式次之。另外,选取了2011年4月28—30日的沙尘天气个例进行分析,发现日本模式对于引发此次沙尘天气的地面高压系统的中期预报指示意义最好。
Abstract:In order to improve the ability to use the products of T639, a synoptic verification on its medium range forecasting in Spring 2011 is made in comparison with the NWP of ECMWF and Japan models. The results show that the three models have good performances on the aspect of predicting the large scale circulation evolution and adjustment in Asian middle and high latitude areas. As a whole, the ECMWF model is better in forecasting most weather systems compared with the T639 and Japan models. Taking the sandstorm process during the period of April 28-30, 2011 as a case, it is found that the Japan model is more effective than the other two models in medium range forecasting of strong surface wind, causing this sand and dust weather process.
文章编号:     中图分类号:    文献标志码:
基金项目:
引用文本:
蔡芗宁,2011.2011年3—5月T639、ECMWF及日本模式中期预报性能检验[J].气象,37(8):1026-1030.
CAI Xiangning,2011.Performance Verification of the Medium Range Forecasting for T639,ECMWF and Japan Models from March to May 2011[J].Meteor Mon,37(8):1026-1030.