本文已被:浏览 1365次 下载 2392次
投稿时间:2014-11-06 修订日期:2015-07-17
投稿时间:2014-11-06 修订日期:2015-07-17
中文摘要: 针对风廓线雷达估算的反射率数据需要进行验证,开展雨滴谱仪与风廓线雷达反射率对比试验,通过两种不同探测设备观测数据的对比,以验证风廓线反射率数据的可靠性和可用性。结果表明:确定了以风廓线低模360~1440 m采样体积内的反射率与3 min雨滴谱反射率数据对比方法能最大程度的减少时空差异;在雨滴谱仪反射率小于40 dBz时,对应的风廓线雷达反射率数据是可靠和可用的;同时由于风廓线雷达有限的动态范围造成反射率低估的现象,使得风廓线雷达反射率在大气垂直结构以及微物理特性等方面应用受到一定的局限性。
中文关键词: 风廓线雷达, 雨滴谱仪, 反射率, 对比试验
Abstract:Focusing on the need that the reflectivity data estimated by wind profile radar should be validated comparison experiment of the reflectivities of wind profile radar (WPR) and the raindrop disdrometer was carried out. Through the comparison of the detection data from the two kinds of detection equipments the reliability and usability of the wind profiler radar reflectivity is tested. The results show that the contrast method between the reflectivity of the low mode 360-1440 m of the wind profile radar and the reflectivity of 3 min raindrop disdrometer is determined to reduce the temporal and spatial differences in maximum extent. When the raindrop disdrometer reflectivity is less than 40 dBz, the wind profile radar reflectivity data are reliable and available. At the same time, the limited dynamic range of the wind profile radar causes the phenomenon of underestimated reflectivity so that the application of the wind profile radar reflectivity is limited somewhat in the atmospheric vertical structure and microphysical properties and so on.
文章编号: 中图分类号: 文献标志码:
基金项目:福建省气象局业务类科研专项项目(2013y04)资助
作者 | 单位 |
汪学渊 | 福建省大气探测技术保障中心,福州 350008 |
阮征 | 中国气象科学研究院,北京 100081 |
李效东 | 福建省大气探测技术保障中心,福州 350008 |
黄丽芬 | 福建省气象台,福州 350001 |
韩伟中 | 福建省大气探测技术保障中心,福州 350008 |
引用文本:
汪学渊,阮征,李效东,黄丽芬,韩伟中,2016.雨滴谱仪与风廓线雷达反射率对比试验[J].气象,42(1):107-114.
WANG Xueyuan,RUAN Zheng,LI Xiaodong,HUANG Lifen,HAN Weizhong,2016.Comparison of the Reflectivities of Wind Profile Radar and Raindrop Disdrometer[J].Meteor Mon,42(1):107-114.
汪学渊,阮征,李效东,黄丽芬,韩伟中,2016.雨滴谱仪与风廓线雷达反射率对比试验[J].气象,42(1):107-114.
WANG Xueyuan,RUAN Zheng,LI Xiaodong,HUANG Lifen,HAN Weizhong,2016.Comparison of the Reflectivities of Wind Profile Radar and Raindrop Disdrometer[J].Meteor Mon,42(1):107-114.